Abstract
Background: Micronized progesterone is an effective preterm birth prophylactic intervention in singleton pregnancies with short cervical length measured via transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester. The use of cervical pessary as a preventive method for preterm birth has controversial findings when compared to progesterone-combining pessary, with the hypothesis that it narrows the uterocervical angle and reduces the risk of preterm birth. This study aimed to evaluate the value of cervical pessary combined with progesterone in the prevention of preterm birth among singleton pregnant women with a short cervix having uterocervical angles ≥ 95°.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent-group design was conducted on 225 singleton pregnant women with a gestational age of 16+0 to 23+6 weeks, who had a cervical length of < 25 mm. Participants were assigned to two groups: prophylactic treatment with progesterone alone or progesterone combined with a cervical pessary. The association between cervical length, uterocervical angle (≥ 95° or ≥ 105°), and preterm birth outcomes (< 37 weeks or < 34 weeks) was assessed using a multivariable binary regression model. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Results: The probability of preterm birth (< 37 weeks) in the group of pregnant women with a uterocervical angle ≥ 95° treated with progesterone plus cervical pessary decreased compared to the progesterone-alone group, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.34 (0.15 - 0.8). In the group of pregnant women with a uterocervical angle ≥ 105°, the treatment by a cervical pessary plus progesterone yielded a lower rate of preterm birth < 37 weeks and < 34 weeks, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.03 (0.01 - 0.13) and 0.08 (0.02 - 0.35), respectively.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggested that a cervical pessary has an added effect combined with progesterone in preventing preterm birth among singleton pregnant women with obtuse uterocervical angles. The preventive effect is stronger if the uterocervical angle measurement is ≥ 105°.
| Published | 2025-08-30 | |
| Fulltext |
|
|
| Language |
|
|
| Issue | Vol. 15 No. 4 (2025) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | 10.34071/jmp.2025.4.18 | |
| Keywords | uterocervical angle, preterm birth, singleton pregnancy, cervical pessary |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2.
Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Global burden of prematurity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(2):74-9.
Coutinho CM, Sotiriadis A, Odibo A, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, Feltovich H, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(3):435-56.
Rotteveel J, van Weissenbruch MM, Twisk JW, Delemarre-Van de Waal HA. Infant and childhood growth patterns, insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure in prematurely born young adults. Pediatrics. 2008;122(2):313-21.
Goldstein MJ, Bailer JM, Gonzalez-Brown VM. Uterocervical angle in predicting spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023;3(3):100240.
Cannie MM, Dobrescu O, Gucciardo L, Strizek B, Ziane S, Sakkas E, et al. Arabin cervical pessary in women at high risk of preterm birth: a magnetic resonance imaging observational follow-up study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):426-33.
Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C, West Honart A, Pham A, Lee SS, et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):376.e1-7.
Singh PK, Srivastava R, Kumar I, Rai S, Pandey S, Shukla RC, et al. Evaluation of Uterocervical Angle and Cervical Length as Predictors of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2022;32(1):10-5.
Goodell M, Leechalad L, Soti V. Are Cervical Pessaries Effective in Preventing Preterm Birth? Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51775.
Xiong YQ, Tan J, Liu YM, Qi YN, He Q, Li L, et al. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singletons and twin pregnancies: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(1):100-9.
Melcer Y, Kovo M, Maymon R, Bar J, Wiener I, Neeman O, et al. Arabin cervical pessary with vaginal progesterone versus vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(20):3439-44.
Mastantuoni E, Saccone G, Gragnano E, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zullo F, Locci M. Cervical pessary in singleton gestations with arrested preterm labor: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(2):100307.
França MS, Hatanaka AR, Cruz JJ, Andrade Júnior VL, Kawanami Hamamoto TE, Sarmento SGP, et al. Cervical pessary plus vaginal progesterone in a singleton pregnancy with a short cervix: an experience-based analysis of cervical pessary’s efficacy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6670-80.
Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA, Aboelfadle Mohamed A. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;12(12):Cd014508.
Liu J, Song G, Meng T, Zhao G. Vaginal progesterone combined with cervical pessary in preventing preterm birth: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(18):3050-6.
Saccone G, Maruotti GM, Giudicepietro A, Martinelli P. Effect of Cervical Pessary on Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Women With Singleton Pregnancies and Short Cervical Length: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2017;318(23):2317-24.
Barinov SV, Artymuk NV, Novikova ON, Shamina IV, Tirskaya YI, Belinina AA, et al. Analysis of risk factors and predictors of pregnancy loss and strategies for the management of cervical insufficiency in pregnant women at a high risk of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(13):2071-9.
Arabin B, Alfirevic Z. Cervical pessaries for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: past, present and future. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):390-9.
Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta- analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):161-80.
Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Da Fonseca E, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, et al. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):10-25.
Stewart LA, Simmonds M, Duley L, Llewellyn A, Sharif S, Walker RA, et al. Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta- analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. The Lancet. 2021;397(10280):1183-94.
Elovitz M, Wang Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate, but not progesterone, protects against inflammation- induced parturition and intrauterine fetal demise. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):693-701.
Furcron AE, Romero R, Plazyo O, Unkel R, Xu Y, Hassan SS, et al. Vaginal progesterone, but not 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate, has antiinflammatory effects at the murine maternal-fetal interface. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):846.e1-.e19.
Zhuang Y, Li H, Na Q, Yin S, Li N. Prevention of Preterm Birth by Cervical Pessary Combined with Vaginal Progesterone: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Reprod Sci. 2023;30(1):93-110.
Daskalakis G, Theodora M, Antsaklis P, Sindos M, Grigoriadis T, Antsaklis A, et al. Assessment of Uterocervical Angle Width as a Predictive Factor of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1837478.
Hessami K, Kasraeian M, Sepúlveda-Martínez Á, Parra-Cordero MC, Vafaei H, Asadi N, et al. The novel ultrasonographic marker of uterocervical angle for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2021;48(2):81-7.
Vink J, Mourad M. The pathophysiology of human premature cervical remodeling resulting in spontaneous preterm birth: Where are we now? Seminars in perinatology. 2017;41(7):427-37.
House M, McCabe R, Socrate S. Using imaging- based, three-dimensional models of the cervix and uterus for studies of cervical changes during pregnancy. Clinical anatomy (New York, NY). 2013;26(1):97-104.
Weiner E, Dekalo A, Feldstein O, Barber E, Schreiber L, Bar J, et al. The placental factor in spontaneous preterm birth in twin vs. singleton pregnancies. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2017;214:1-5.
Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Pre- induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2007;47(5):389-93.