Abstract
Background: Epidural analgesia (EA) is widely considered the gold standard for pain relief during labor. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of EA on labor progression and maternal-neonatal outcomes in women undergoing vaginal delivery.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2024 to February 2025. Term pregnant women in spontaneous labor with singleton, cephalic fetuses (37⁰–41⁶ gestational weeks) were enrolled and categorized by parity (nulliparous or multiparous) and EA status. Labor progress was monitored using the World Health Organization (WHO) Labor Care Guide (LCG) (2018), focusing on the active phase of the first stage and the second stage. Primary outcomes included duration of labor stages, maternal complications, and neonatal outcomes.
Results: In nulliparous women, EA significantly prolonged both the active phase of the first and second stages of labor compared to those without EA (p < 0.05). EA initiated at < 5 cm cervical dilation was associated with a longer second stage (37.7 ± 30.4 vs. 25.9 ± 22.6 minutes, p = 0.022). In multiparous women, the duration of labor did not differ significantly between the EA and control groups (p > 0.05). EA use was not associated with increased rates of severe perineal lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage, uterotonic use, or low APGAR scores in either group.
Conclusions: Epidural analgesia provides effective pain relief during labor without increasing the risk of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. However, it may prolong labor duration in nulliparous women, especially when initiated early (< 5 cm cervical dilation). Individualized counseling and careful monitoring are recommended to ensure safety and optimize outcomes.
| Published | 2025-12-30 | |
| Fulltext |
|
|
| Language |
|
|
| Issue | Vol. 15 No. 6 (2025) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | 10.34071/jmp.2025.6.882 | |
| Keywords | Epidural analgesia, Labor pain, Labor duration, Maternal outcomes, Neonatal outcomes |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy
Organization WH. WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: World Health Organization; 2018.
Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 209: Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019;133(3):e208-e25.
Halliday L, Nelson SM, Kearns RJ. Epidural analgesia in labor: a narrative review. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2022;159(2):356-64.
Smyth R, Anim-Somuah M, Cyna A, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Library. 2018.
He F-Y, Wang S. Epidural analgesia for labor: effects on length of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2023;27(1).
Deepak D, Kumari A, Mohanty R, Prakash J, Kumar T, Priye S. Effects of epidural analgesia on labor pain and course of labor in primigravid parturients: a prospective non-randomized comparative study. Cureus. 2022;14(6).
Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;123(3):527-35.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018(5).
Luo D, Yuan Y, Guo L, Chen Z. A comparative study of epidural labor analgesia and natural delivery without analgesia. American journal of translational research. 2021;13(6):7015.
Wang T-T, Sun S, Huang S-Q. Effects of epidural labor analgesia with low concentrations of local anesthetics on obstetric outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017;124(5):1571-80.
Guideline CG190 N. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. 2023.
Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. The Lancet. 1974;304(7889):1127-31.
Sultan AH. Obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clinical Risk. 1999;5(6):193-6.
No G-tG. The management of third-and fourthdegree perineal tears. MIDIRS. 2015;2:9.
Organization WH. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage 2012.
No G-tG. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. Bjog. 2016;124:e106-e49.
Chao Y-S, McCormack S. Carbetocin for the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage: a review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and guidelines. 2019.
Anwar S, Anwar MW, Ayaz A, Danish N, Ahmad S. Effect of epidural analgesia on labor and its outcomes. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2015;27(1):146-50.
Shivanagappa M, Kumararadhya GB, Thammaiah SH, Swamy AHM, Suhas N. Progress of Labor and Obstetric Outcome in Parturients with Combined Spinal–Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Comparative Study. Annals of African Medicine. 2021;20(4):270-5.
Khatun M, Rahim MA, Rahman F. Evaluation of the effects of epidural labour analgesia on mode of delivery. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 13(4):838.
Loewenberg-Weisband Y, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Ioscovich A, Samueloff A, Calderon-Margalit R. Epidural analgesia and severe perineal tears: a literature review and large cohort study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2014;27(18):1864-9.
Dendini M, Aldossari SK, AlQassab HA, Aldraihem OO, Almalki A, AlQassab H. Retrospective case-control study of extended birth perineal tears and risk factors. Cureus. 2024;16(3).
Ambrosetti F, Grandi G, Petrella E, Sampogna V, Donno L, Rinaldi L, et al. The impact of epidural analgesia on delivery mode in Robson class 1 women: a retrospective cohort study. AJOG Global Reports. 2023;3(2):100207.